Why Didn’t Luke Include The Deaths Of Paul, Peter and James In The Books Of Acts?

Why Didn’t Luke Include The Deaths Of Paul, Peter and James In The Books Of Acts? June 14, 2016/0 Comments//by J. Warner Wallace In my book, Cold Case Christianity, I attempt to evaluate the gospel accounts with the same criteria used by jurors to assess the reliability of eyewitnesses in a criminal case. In California, jurors are encouraged to ask themselves, “How well could the witness see, hear, or otherwise perceive the things about which the witness testified?” In essence, jurors must determine whether or not a witness was even present and able to see what it is they say they saw! For those of us who are examining the gospel accounts, this means we’ve got to answer the simple question, “Were the gospel written early enough to have been written by people who were actually present for the life and ministry of Jesus?” This is a critical question in evaluating the reliability of the New Testament gospels, and I think the Books of Acts is the key to the answer.

Source: Why Didn’t Luke Include The Deaths Of Paul, Peter and James In The Books Of Acts?

Advertisements